Showing posts with label Headphones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Headphones. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

CNET Exclusive: Up to 50 percent off headphones for a good cause

Liza CNET  
This week I am most excited about the GoGroove AudiOHM iDX Noise Isolating Earbuds with Integrated Microphone for only $14.99. They not only sound good, but the profits go to a good cause. The Fender Music Foundation provides grants for music education programs such as classrooms, community-based organizations, and music therapy programs. Accessory Power has partnered with The Fender Music Foundation to raise awareness and funding for the foundation. Five percent of net profits from the sale of all AudiOHM iDX models during this CNET Exclusive will be donated to the Fender Music Foundation. These comfortable earbuds with built-in mic are the perfect gadget to fill any stocking. 
Accessory Genie didn't stop there, it's also hooking up the CNET audience with up to 50 percent off on portable speakers, chargers, and more. Head over to CNET Exclusives today to find out more.


View the Original article

Monday, November 12, 2012

Subjekt Pulse Bluetooth Headphones (PLS-9600)

By Tim Gideon
Stereo Bluetooth headphones are sounding a lot better than they used to, thanks to serious improvements with Bluetooth codecs. Suddenly, we have a lot of options to consider—even budget-friendly options—that offer surprisingly good sound. Subjekt's Pulse Bluetooth Headphones ($99.99 direct) are one such pair, providing solid audio performance for their under-$100 price. The only problem: So does another pair we've reviewed...a pair that, to understate
things, looks and sounds very similar, yet costs $30 less. So, our generally positive review of the Pulse now becomes a side-by-side comparision of the Pulse and the eerily similar Outdoor Technology DJ Slims .

Design
There's no other way to put it: The Subjekt Pulse looks alarmingly like the DJ Slims. Both pairs feature a wide black plastic headband and near-identical controls—the only obvious differences are in ear pad size and paint job. Even the metallic headband adjustors look the same, and when you remove the earpads, the enclosures and grilles housing the drivers look identical (same size and number of holes, same swivel-type mount to the headband). There are some other subtle differentiators, like the use of different headband material textures (rubberized on the DJ Slims, glossy on the Pulse) and a raised, stylized button surface on the DJ Slims—see the picture below for a side-by-side comparison.


The Power button and controls are located on the right earpiece, and a dummy set of controls (that look like buttons but aren't) covers the left earpiece's outer panel, presumably for aesthetic symmetry. Yup, same setup on the DJ Slims. The blinking blue status LED is sized and placed identically on both pairs—something, by the way, that's not optimal. The light could be smaller, and placed somewhere so that those around you don't have to see it flashing constantly while you wear them.

Basically, it looks like Outdoor Technology and Subjekt bought their headphone frames from the same OEM. Does that mean they sound identical? Hard to say! We'll discuss this more at length later on in the review, but we have to give Subjekt the benefit of the doubt here, because there are enough physical differences (the contour of the controls, the glossy versus rubberized headband materials) that it's possible the internals are slightly different, as well.

The Subjekt Pulse comes with a charging cable but no actual charger—this is increasingly the standard for Bluetooth headsets, but it's not a good thing. It ensures that you'll need a computer with a USB port (or charger) around in order to get juice when the battery needs recharging—but what if you want to travel light? Isn't the point of highly mobile, wireless headphones to cut down on the clutter? For the record, the DJ Slims are guilty of the same crime.

Subjekt rates battery life for the Pulse at about 10-11 hours, which is comparable to the DJ Slims. The Pulse supports Bluetooth 2.1 and headset, hands-free, A2DP, and AVRCP Bluetooth profiles.


Performance
The Pulse delivers deep bass cleanly, even at maximum volumes—there may be a hint of distortion when both the sound source and the headphones are at maximum volume on tracks like our bass test track, "Silent Shout," by the Knife, but it is barely noticeable.


The mids and highs sound tweaked and sculpted, and the end result is very crisp, and ideal for a lot of popular modern music styles. It works well on classical tracks, too, like John Adams' "The Chairman Dances," bringing out higher register strings and percussion, while adding a bit of low-end boost to the lower register percussion and strings. It's never over the top, but it's clear that this is not really a flat-response sound signature, so audiophiles and purists will likely want to steer clear.

Call clarity on the Pulse is not a strength—my call partners often said I sounded muffled, as did their audio at times. I was using an iPhone 4S, which isn't exactly the king of call clarity to begin with, but this seemed a bit more muffled than usual. Regardless, it was never so unintelligible that we couldn't understand each other. Operating the on-ear controls for volume, playback, and answering calls was a snap.

Okay, now let's bring back the side-by-side comparison. There's no denying that the two pairs sound very similar, in terms of brightness and bass response. It did seem, with both pairs at maximum volume as well as the iPhone 4S source maxed out, that the Subjekt Pulse was slightly louder, but this could be anything from a slight disparity between two (possibly) identical products, a slight variance in performance due to the two pairs using slightly different drivers, or even the thickness and shape of the foam ear pads could make the difference.

It's hard to say for sure if the Pulse and the DJ Slims are the same pair of headphones wearing different costumes. Probably. But it's hardly a unique situation; enterprising young companies often choose to put their own stamp on models also offered to their direct competition by OEMs.

It also doesn't mean the Pulse is ripping off the DJ Slims, or vice-versa—they're both quality budget Bluetooth headphone options. What it really comes down to is price. Regardless of whether these are the same OEM model or not, they sound very similar, but the DJ Slims are a full $30 less. That's quite a discount. It's enough that we forgive the DJ Slims some shortcomings because it's priced at about $70, while we are less forgiving of the Pulse, which is priced around $100.

This was a complicated review to write: I don't think the Subjekt Pulse is anything but a solid, affordable pair of Bluetooth headphones. There just happens to be a far more affordable option offering the same performance for $30 less. Obviously, this affects the rating. If these side-by-side comparisons give you a headache, I don't blame you. The good news is, there are other quality Bluetooth options too. The Sennheiser MM 100  is a well-priced, behind-the-head headband style pair, and if you have some more money to spend, the recent Beats by Dr. Dre Wireless  offers audio that may be highly sculpted, but still sounds great, especially if you're a bass lover. If you'd rather go the in-ear route, the Phiaton PS 20 BT  is another inexpensive Bluetooth option.



View the original article here


Sunday, November 11, 2012

Monster DNA On-Ear Headphones

By Tim Gideon
The partnership between Monster and Beats that began with the Monster Beats by Dr. Dre is no longer, and now both brands make their own exclusive headphone models. The most recent from Monster is the DNA On-Ear headphones ($229.95 direct), with a highly stylized look that can be customized with various skins. The sound signature would still fit well in the Beats lineup, with boosted bass and highs that make pop music sound exciting, but will likely turn off audiophiles seeking flat response. The fact that the DNA distorts on tracks with deep bass at maximum volume is not as much of an issue as the price. Recently, we've seen a few better-sounding options at lower prices.


Design
The DNA has a futuristic look, with rounded, triangular earpieces and circular, supra-aural (on-ear) earpads. Available in a variety of color combinations, our review model was white, glossy plastic, with gray padding and gray, rubberized material on the underside of the headband. This material is soft, but doesn't exactly feel like an overstuffed pillow floating on your head. The earpads can also feel a bit uncomfortable over time. The fit is secure, but the slight discomfort is one of the first things I noticed after a few minutes of testing.


Monster includes two cables, one with inline controls and a microphone for mobile phone calls. That the cables are removable and replaceable adds significant value to the DNA's price—since cables are often the culprit when headphones malfunction, you can simply replace the cable rather than look into repairs or replacing the whole thing. Monster DNA inline

Other than the two cables, the only other accessory is a black felt drawstring bag that has internal pockets and a carabiner attached. As mentioned earlier, the DNA is designed to be customized by the user—the skins cost an extra $29.95 each, and come in flashy varieties such as leopard print, peacock feathers, and a carbon fiber look. With or without the skins, the color schemes for the headphones are the aforementioned white/gray, black/chrome, blue/gray, blue/chrome, and white/teal.


Performance
On songs that feature deep bass, the DNA often distorts at high volume levels. A song like The Knife's "Silent Shout" starts to get fuzzy when you approach maximum volume. Granted, this is a volume you shouldn't be listening at, but at this price, distortion shouldn't enter the equation. At moderate-to-high volumes, before distortion kicks in, the bass response is powerful—even palpable, as the headphone frame vibrates noticeably with the beat. This gets less intense at even more moderate volumes, where the deep bass and highly sculpted high frequency response—two typical Monster traits—work far better together to create an exciting mix.


On classical tracks, like John Adams' "The Chairman Dances," the boosted bass response lends some heft to the lower register percussion and strings. It's not what most audiophiles are looking for, as the bass and highs are quite exaggerated, but it does add some crispness and resonance to the mix without going overboard.

Generally, however, the DNA is best suited for modern mixes in popular music. At moderate volumes, the kick drum loop in Jay-Z and Kanye West's "No Church in the Wild" has a crisp attack backed up by an impressive thump, while the deep bass synth hits pack plenty of low-end resonance without distortion coming into the equation. The vocals are never obscured by the low-end intensity.

On Radiohead's "Staircase," the bouncing, doubled guitar-and-bass line carries a nice low-frequency presence, never booming, but definitely the star of the mix—except for Thom Yorke's vocals, which are crisp and sit above everything else, thanks to the DNA's mid-to-high boost.

If you're a fan of deep bass, the DNA is not a bad choice—you just have to accept the distortion at high volumes. A better-sounding example of what Monster can do with boosted low-end is the more expensive, bulkier, and sturdier Monster Inspiration . It's not perfect, but it performs with more power than the DNA, and without distortion.

If you're seeking something a little closer to audiophile standards, the excellent Sennheiser HD 558 recently won an Editors' Choice award, and it costs less than the DNA, while the $200 Harmon Kardon CL also delivers quality audio at a slightly lower price. Also, the Bowers & Wilkins P3 ($200) is a lightweight on-ear pair with a refined bass response and design to match. The DNA doesn't quite stack up to the aforementioned models, and since it's more expensive than most of them, it feels overpriced.



View the original article here


Monday, November 5, 2012

Subject Pulse Bluetooth Headphones (PLS-9600)

There's no other way to put it: The Subject Pulse looks alarmingly like the DJ Slims. Both pairs feature a wide black plastic headband and near-identical controls—the only obvious differences are in ear pad size and paint job. Even the metallic headband adjusters look the same, and when you remove the ear pads  the enclosures and grilles housing the drivers look identical (same size and number of holes, same swivel-type mount to the headband). There are some other subtle differentiators, like the use of different headband material textures (rubberized on the DJ Slims, glossy on the Pulse) and a raised, stylized button surface on the DJ Slims—see the picture below for a side-by-side comparison.

The Power button and controls are located on the right earpiece, and a dummy set of controls (that look like buttons but aren't) covers the left earpiece's outer panel, presumably for aesthetic symmetry. Yup, same setup on the DJ Slims. The blinking blue status LED is sized and placed identically on both pairs—something, by the way, that's not optimal. The light could be smaller, and placed somewhere so that those around you don't have to see it flashing constantly while you wear them.

View the Original article